The war on plastic bags, by the numbers

|
Sayyid Abdul Azim/AP
A customer in Nairobi, Kenya takes his purchases in a cloth carrier bag, Aug. 28, 2017. A ban on plastic bags came into force in Kenya, and those found violating the new regulation could receive maximum fines of $38,000 or a four-year jail term.

At least 127 countries now regulate single-use plastic bags at some level, with African nations currently in the lead. Some 34 of them have imposed bans or limits on most forms of single-use plastics and bags. Some have even gone so far as to ban imports of single-use plastics and plastic waste from more developed countries. 

But the increase in regulations doesn’t necessarily translate to reductions in plastic winding up in landfills and the ocean. Bans are far from universal, and they can be difficult to enforce. A more effective solution would be to stop the production of plastic bags to begin with, says Carole Excell, acting director of Environmental Democracy Practice at the World Resources Institute. 

“If we don’t start caring about restricting production, we will continue to have the same problem,” she says. 

The United Nations estimates that the world consumes between 1 trillion and 5 trillion plastic bags per year. Little is known about the overall impact of bans on the waste stream. Some nations have reported a drop in plastic bag consumption, but others have seen little or no change. 

“There’s progress,” Ms. Excell says, “but there’s a lot of complexity in actually getting a handle on plastic and the waste that it causes.”

SOURCE:

United Nations Environment Programme

|
Jacob Turcotte/Staff

You've read  of  free articles. Subscribe to continue.
Real news can be honest, hopeful, credible, constructive.
What is the Monitor difference? Tackling the tough headlines – with humanity. Listening to sources – with respect. Seeing the story that others are missing by reporting what so often gets overlooked: the values that connect us. That’s Monitor reporting – news that changes how you see the world.

Dear Reader,

About a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”:

“Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.”

If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.

But you know what? We change lives. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in.

The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908.

We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. And we can prove it.”

If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. You’ll get the Monitor Weekly magazine, the Monitor Daily email, and unlimited access to CSMonitor.com.

QR Code to The war on plastic bags, by the numbers
Read this article in
https://www.csmonitor.com/Environment/2019/0716/The-war-on-plastic-bags-by-the-numbers
QR Code to Subscription page
Start your subscription today
https://www.csmonitor.com/subscribe